lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:10:27 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ext2: write superblock only once on unmount

On Mon 02-04-12 16:44:09, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 21-03-12 18:14:30, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to
> > > the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This
> > > patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times.
> >   Looks good. I've added the patch to my tree.
> 
> I would like to test v2 against your tree, I found this one:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git
> 
> but I do not see this patch there - is that the right tree, or may be
> you did not push out? Which branch should I use?
  Yeah, I didn't push out the changes. Now they are out (for_next /
for_testing) branch.

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists