[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120402221027.GD5270@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:10:27 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] ext2: write superblock only once on unmount
On Mon 02-04-12 16:44:09, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 13:53 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 21-03-12 18:14:30, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to
> > > the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This
> > > patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times.
> > Looks good. I've added the patch to my tree.
>
> I would like to test v2 against your tree, I found this one:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git
>
> but I do not see this patch there - is that the right tree, or may be
> you did not push out? Which branch should I use?
Yeah, I didn't push out the changes. Now they are out (for_next /
for_testing) branch.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists