[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C53AC043-C67D-44DD-9A11-3A196627668A@whamcloud.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:24:51 -0500
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Fan Yong <yong.fan@...mcloud.com>, bfields@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 2/4] Return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage type
On 2012-04-24, at 4:07 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> 1) For SEEK_END, we now return -EINVAL for a positive offset (i.e. past EOF)
>
> I definitely introduces that one, as I cannot see how an application
> might ever run into it. Especially as ext4 directories cannot shrink. So
> if an application tries to exceed the directory size limit, it looks to
> me as some of attempt to break something or as an error in the
> application. However, if there should be the slightest chance to break
> existing applications relying on that, we need to remove that.
I think the other reason to avoid SEEK_END + n is that since SEEK_END
for a hash offset is (signed) MAX_LONG, so if one seeks beyond that
it will wrap to a negative offset.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger Whamcloud, Inc.
Principal Lustre Engineer http://www.whamcloud.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists