[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F9812C7.3020300@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:05:43 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>
CC: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Fan Yong <yong.fan@...mcloud.com>,
bfields@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 2/4] Return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage
type
On 4/24/12 5:24 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2012-04-24, at 4:07 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> 1) For SEEK_END, we now return -EINVAL for a positive offset (i.e. past EOF)
>>
>> I definitely introduces that one, as I cannot see how an application
>> might ever run into it. Especially as ext4 directories cannot shrink. So
>> if an application tries to exceed the directory size limit, it looks to
>> me as some of attempt to break something or as an error in the
>> application. However, if there should be the slightest chance to break
>> existing applications relying on that, we need to remove that.
>
> I think the other reason to avoid SEEK_END + n is that since SEEK_END
> for a hash offset is (signed) MAX_LONG, so if one seeks beyond that
> it will wrap to a negative offset.
Makes sense.
Wishing this had been done as a separate patch, though, since it's really addressing a separate issue from the $SUBJECT, and could have used specific documentation of the change. Nitpicky I know, but it helps.
-Eric
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger Whamcloud, Inc.
> Principal Lustre Engineer http://www.whamcloud.com/
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists