lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:05:43 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <>
To:	Andreas Dilger <>
CC:	Bernd Schubert <>,, Fan Yong <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 2/4] Return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage

On 4/24/12 5:24 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2012-04-24, at 4:07 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> 1) For SEEK_END, we now return -EINVAL for a positive offset (i.e. past EOF)
>> I definitely introduces that one, as I cannot see how an application
>> might ever run into it. Especially as ext4 directories cannot shrink. So
>> if an application tries to exceed the directory size limit, it looks to
>> me as some of attempt to break something or as an error in the
>> application. However, if there should be the slightest chance to break
>> existing applications relying on that, we need to remove that.
> I think the other reason to avoid SEEK_END + n is that since SEEK_END
> for a hash offset is (signed) MAX_LONG, so if one seeks beyond that
> it will wrap to a negative offset.

Makes sense.

Wishing this had been done as a separate patch, though, since it's really addressing a separate issue from the $SUBJECT, and could have used specific documentation of the change.  Nitpicky I know, but it helps.


> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger                       Whamcloud, Inc.
> Principal Lustre Engineer  

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists