[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120514235432.GA3199@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:54:32 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: turn on i_version updates by default
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:33:04PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I said as much in another reply - that once i_version is used on
> a filesystem, it should be made "sticky" (i.e. permanently enabled
> for that filesystem). However, until that time it shouldn't be
> enabled just because it might one day be used.
>
> Even better than just blindly bumping the i_version on every change,
> it would be better to have users of i_version (i.e. knfsd) flag the
> inode with "needs i_version update" then read the version. When the
> filesystem/VFS bumps i_version the next time it can clear this flag
> and not update i_version again until after the next time i_version
> is actually used.
I really don't want to do anything more complicated than necessary.
What would be the worst-case test for the extra inode dirtying, so we
can see what the numbers actually are?
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists