[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120528220821.GC5610@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:08:21 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, jouni.siren@....fi, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: change return value from int to ssize_t
in ext4_file_write
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:22:37AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On 64-platform, when we do a write operation with a huge number of data, it
> will cause that the ret variable overflows. So it is replaced with ssize_t.
>
> Reported-by: Jouni Siren <jouni.siren@....fi>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Applied, with the following commit description:
ext4: use consistent ssize_t type in ext4_file_write()
The generic_file_aio_write() function returns ssize_t, and
ext4_file_write() returns a ssize_t, so use a ssize_t to collect the
return value from generic_file_aio_write(). It shouldn't matter since
the VFS read/write paths shouldn't allow a read greater than MAX_INT,
but there was previously a bug in the AIO code paths, and it's best if
we use a consistent type so that the return value from
generic_file_aio_write() can't get truncated.
Regards,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists