[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120709141248.GB3649@thunk.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:12:48 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Use s_csum_seed instead of i_csum_seed for xattr
block csum.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:13:56PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>
> In xattr block operation, we use h_refcount to indicate whether the
> xattr block is shared among many inodes. And xattr block csum uses
> s_csum_seed if it is shared and i_csum_seed if it belongs to
> one inode. But this has a problem. So consider the block is shared
> first bewteen inode A and B, and B has some xattr update and CoW
> the xattr block. When it updates the *old* xattr block(because
> of the h_refcount change) and calls ext4_xattr_release_block, we
> has no idea that inode A is the real owner of the *old* xattr
> block and we can't use the i_csum_seed of inode A either in xattr
> block csum calculation. And I don't think we have an easy way to
> find inode A.
>
> So this patch just removes the tricky i_csum_seed and we now uses
> s_csum_seed every time for the xattr block csum. The corresponding
> patch for the e2fsprogs will be sent in another patch.
>
> This is spotted by xfstests 117.
>
> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists