| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> CC: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS >> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests). > > Hi Mark, > > Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests > tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the > kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of > the ones in the kernel.org tree)? > > I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the > kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed > on that point? That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com going forward, just to simplify things. We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet I guess. So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com. Thanks, -Eric > Thanks, > > - Ted > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@....sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists