[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5058BB5F.5050506@sandeen.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
>> version and not in the kernel.org developers version of xfstests).
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
> tree and the one on kernel.org? Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
> kernel.org tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
> the ones in the kernel.org tree)?
>
> I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
> kernel.org tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
> on that point?
That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to
ditch the kernel.org repos and let sgi manage a single repo on oss.sgi.com
going forward, just to simplify things.
We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet
I guess.
So going forward, stick with the one on oss.sgi.com.
Thanks,
-Eric
> Thanks,
>
> - Ted
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@....sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists