lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:20:15 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <>
CC:	Mark Tinguely <>,,,
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?

On 9/18/12 1:15 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
>> version and not in the developers version of xfstests).
> Hi Mark,
> Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
> tree and the one on  Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
> tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
> the ones in the tree)?
> I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
> tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
> on that point?

That was more or less correct at one point, but we recently decided to
ditch the repos and let sgi manage a single repo on
going forward, just to simplify things.

We just reached that agreement and haven't really communicated it yet
I guess.

So going forward, stick with the one on


> Thanks,
> 						- Ted
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists