lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:28:41 -0500
From:	Ben Myers <>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <>
Cc:	Mark Tinguely <>,
	Dave Chinner <>,,,
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?

Hey Ted,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:15:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:43:36AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > xfstest 285 and 286 (I believe these tests were only in the OSS
> > version and not in the developers version of xfstests).
> Could you clarify what the relationship is between the OSS xfstests
> tree and the one on  Is the OSS tree always ahead of the
> tree (i.e., are the commits in the OSS tree a superset of
> the ones in the tree)?

The trees on are being retired.  I'm not sure what Christoph is
going to do with the repos, but expect new changes to go directly
into the xfstests repo on

> I had been under the impression that commits flowed from the
> tree to the OSS tree, but it sounds like I was misinformed
> on that point?

Your impression is just a few days out of date.  See:

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists