lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500
From:	Ben Myers <>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <>
	Mark Tinguely <>,
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?

Hey Ted,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date.  See:
> > 
> >
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?

You might even be the first person to suggest that.  ;)

> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc.  I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...

I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list.  But
like you said, isn't extremely high volume.  Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists