[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500
From: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Hey Ted,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html
>
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?
You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;)
> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
>
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...
I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But
like you said, xfs@....sgi.com isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?
Regards,
Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists