linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120922000217.GB27207@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:02:17 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
Cc:	Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1)

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:19:54AM +0800, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
> Hi  Ted,
> 
> I notices you cares Signed-off line, so I just throw a message.
> 
> I noticed you changed all Signed-off line of patches, some patches are
> written by me initially and is modified by Allison and Zheng. So I
> think Signed-off line should be me, Allison and Zheng.  Do I
> misunderstand the rules?

Thanks, I didn't realize that you and Allison had written parts of the
patches.  Yes, in that case it should be "Signed-off-by".  I've made
this change to my tree.  (And this is why I don't cast commits into
stone for a few days before I advance the master branch pointer.)

      	    	     	      	      	  	 - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html