lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:27:14 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
	Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize extent status tree

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:37:40PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:24:26AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > > Can you let me know what changes you need to make?  If it is to add
> > > new features or new sanity checks, does it make sense to simply make
> > > it as new commits to existing patch set?  Or are there fundamental
> > > problems with the current set, that would be better to fix in the
> > > current set of commits?  (Or is it just minor stylistic/spelling
> > > fixes?)
> > > 
> > > Thanks!!
> > 
> > In new patch set, there is three changes as beblow:
> > 
> > 1. add a sanity check in ext4_evict_inode()
> > 2. fix a bug in ext4_find_delalloc_range().  This bug is reported by
> > xfstest #230 when we enable bigalloc feature.
> > 3. Add a new rwlock to protect extent status tree.
> > 
> > So I think that we can only add a sanity check and fix the bigalloc bug,
> > and then apply this patch set because the changes are minor.  For adding
> > a new lock to protect extent status tree, we can add this feature in a
> > new patch.  If you think it is OK, I can generate a new patch set, do
> > some tests using xfstest, and submit it as soon as possible.  What's
> > your opinion?
> 
> Do you think you can get me the patches by the end of the week?  If
> so, that should work.

Hi Ted,

Until now, I have fixed the bigalloc bug that is reported by xfstest
#230, and merged Hugh's patch.  But I do really think that this patch
set couldn't be applied at this merge window because the change is not
*minor*, and it still needs to do more tests.  That would be great if
you can keep this patch set in dev branch at this merge window.  Thanks!

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists