linux-ext4 - Re: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20121101010521.893.qmail@science.horizon.com>
Date:	31 Oct 2012 21:05:21 -0400
From:	"George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To:	darrick.wong@...cle.com, linux@...izon.com, tytso@....edu
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tm@....ma
Subject: Re: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock

I'm currently running with two ext4 patches:

Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Sun Oct 7 22:18:56 2012 -0400
Subject: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock

Author: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Date: Wed Oct 17 12:51:30 2012 -0700
Subject: ext4: Don't verify checksums of dx non-leaf nodes during fallback linear scan

They appear to fix real problems.  I notice, that neither of these have
made it into 2.6.5.  Should they be sent to -stable at some point?

I'm not trying to overrule your judgements on the matter, just ensure that
the omission is actually a conscious decision rather than an oversight.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html