[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121101011312.GG19591@blackbox.djwong.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:13:12 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tm@....ma
Subject: Re: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:05:21PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> I'm currently running with two ext4 patches:
>
> Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Date: Sun Oct 7 22:18:56 2012 -0400
> Subject: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock
>
> Author: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> Date: Wed Oct 17 12:51:30 2012 -0700
> Subject: ext4: Don't verify checksums of dx non-leaf nodes during fallback linear scan
>
> They appear to fix real problems. I notice, that neither of these have
> made it into 2.6.5. Should they be sent to -stable at some point?
>
> I'm not trying to overrule your judgements on the matter, just ensure that
> the omission is actually a conscious decision rather than an oversight.
<shrug> I was wondering too, but I figured Ted was probably busy dealing with
the corruption bug and such.
(Which itself doesn't seem to be in 3.6.x yet)
I suppose it's a good sign that it's been more than a week and you haven't hit
anything else...
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists