linux-ext4 - Fwd: What should be the optimum value of G (number-of-groups) when using flex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOiN93nGvYNZUiNRq23ThDU+sYmooAgjjTfYode3vdXna2E7fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:06:19 +0530
From:	Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, adilger@...ger.ca
Cc:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: What should be the optimum value of G (number-of-groups) when
 using flex_bg?

We have a 2TB HDD which we formated using default options of mkfs.ext4(v1.42.6).
I took around ~15 seconds to complete this operation.

Than we formatted the same partition with "-G 1024" and there was
around 30% performance improvement in
the mkfs.ext4 timings.

Than, out of curiosity, we increased the G's value to 1048576 and
there was a drastic degradation in the performance of mkfs.ext4.
It took more than 5 minutes to complete the execution.

Is it the expected behavior?

AFAIK flex_bg is on by default with G's vaule as 16. Can we consider
this the optimum value?

Any suggesstions on what  we can set the Gs value for a 2TB HDD such
that both the FS and the
mkfs.ext4 gives optimum performance?
It would be really helpful if somebody can shed some light over this feature.

Thanks,
Ashish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html