[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <701D25F0-1D33-420C-8D5C-C65734E32E13@dilger.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:02:25 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What should be the optimum value of G (number-of-groups) when using flex_bg?
On 2012-11-05, at 9:36 PM, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
> We have a 2TB HDD which we formated using default options of mkfs.ext4(v1.42.6).
> I took around ~15 seconds to complete this operation.
>
> Than we formatted the same partition with "-G 1024" and there was
> around 30% performance improvement in
> the mkfs.ext4 timings.
>
> Than, out of curiosity, we increased the G's value to 1048576 and
> there was a drastic degradation in the performance of mkfs.ext4.
> It took more than 5 minutes to complete the execution.
>
> Is it the expected behavior?
The optimum number is very workload specific. We use "-G 256" and
a few other options so that the number of metadata blocks per group
is a multiple of 1MB and aligned on 1MB boundaries. This is for
optimized IO on RAID-6 storage that has good IO performance with 1MB
chunk sizes.
> AFAIK flex_bg is on by default with G's vaule as 16. Can we consider
> this the optimum value?
>
> Any suggesstions on what we can set the Gs value for a 2TB HDD such
> that both the FS and the
> mkfs.ext4 gives optimum performance?
> It would be really helpful if somebody can shed some light over this feature.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists