[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50F0AF49.6010902@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:33:13 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: add debug switch to use old online interface
On 1/11/13 6:30 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:52:53AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> --- a/resize/resize2fs.h
>> +++ b/resize/resize2fs.h
>> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ typedef struct ext2_sim_progress *ext2_sim_progmeter;
>> #define RESIZE_DEBUG_BMOVE 0x0002
>> #define RESIZE_DEBUG_INODEMAP 0x0004
>> #define RESIZE_DEBUG_ITABLEMOVE 0x0008
>> +/* old online resize interface */
>> +#define RESIZE_DEBUG_OLD 0x0010
>
> 0x0010 is already used for
>
> #define RESIZE_DEBUG_RTRACK 0x0010
>
> (which is very useful for performance tuning resize2fs).
Ugh, how did I miss that. Sorry.
> I wonder if we would be better off using a environment variable for
> this? Mainly because currently, the current resize flags don't
> actually change the behavior of resize2fs, but just add different
> levels of debugging messages.
The mechanism doesn't matter to me, we just need to be able to test
it if the interface is in the kernel. I had originally had an "-o"
option for "old interface" but that didn't seem great.
-Eric
>
> - Ted
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists