linux-ext4 - Re: [Suggestion] fs/ext3: memory leak by calling set_qf_name or clear_qf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50F36D7C.2020107@asianux.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:29:16 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] fs/ext3: memory leak by calling set_qf_name or clear_qf_name,
 many times.

于 2013年01月08日 11:13, Chen Gang 写道:
> 于 2013年01月08日 03:54, Jan Kara 写道:
>> > On Fri 04-01-13 13:39:37, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> >>   if what I guess is true
>>> >>     it seems we have to duplicate memory for old_opts in ext3_remount.
>>> >>     and for clear_qf_name, set_qf_name, ext3_remount:
>>> >>       use normal memory allocation and free ways instead of current using.
>> >   Yes. Updated patch attached.
>> > 
>   at least for me, Jan Kara's patch is ok. thanks.
> 
>   welcome another members (especially Theodore Ts'o) to giving confirmation or completion.
>   also welcome to checking this suggestion whether valid for fs/ext4.

  I will send a relative patch for fs/ext4, just according to Jan Kara's patch.
  I will send it within 2 weeks (excuse me, I have to do another things this week).

  welcome any additional suggestions and completions.

  thanks.

-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html