linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fslibs: fix llseek on i386

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:48:08 +0800
From:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Phillip Susi <psusi@...ntu.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fslibs: fix llseek on i386

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:16:05PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:25:14AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > 
> > This patch makes me consider my patches that dump a sparse file in
> > debugfs.  In my patch [1] llseek64(2) is called to seek to the next
> > data in target file.  So I believe ext2fs_llseek() is a better choice.
> > I am happy to send a newer patch to fix it.  What do you think?
> > 
> > 1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg36134.html
> 
> You're right, we should use ext2fs_llseek() for better portability.
> Thanks,

Yep, the next version will be sent out soon.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html