lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:06:49 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	xi.wang@...il.com, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH] debugfs: add sanity check to make sure we never shift 64 bits right

In the tables which are used to parse the fields for the set_fields
command, there should never be a entry which has a size set to 8
bytes, and two pointers defined.  Not only would it result in
undefined behavior in the compiled code, it doesn't make any sense and
is definitely a bug.

Reported-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 debugfs/set_fields.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debugfs/set_fields.c b/debugfs/set_fields.c
index 08bfd8d..5c86d74 100644
--- a/debugfs/set_fields.c
+++ b/debugfs/set_fields.c
@@ -389,7 +389,10 @@ static errcode_t parse_uint(struct field_set_info *info, char *field,
 	n = num & mask;
 	switch (size) {
 	case 8:
-		*u.ptr64 = n;
+		/* Should never get here */
+		fprintf(stderr, "64-bit field %s has a second 64-bit field\n"
+			"defined; BUG?!?\n", info->name);
+		*u.ptr64 = 0;
 		break;
 	case 4:
 		*u.ptr32 = n;
-- 
1.7.12.rc0.22.gcdd159b

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists