[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128140757.GB32246@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:07:57 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Ext3: remove a useless check for the function
ext3_free_blocks_sb
On Sat 26-01-13 14:58:31, Wang Shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Because 'block + count < block' always comes to false, it is useless
> to have this check, just remove it.
As Andreas commented, the test is actually correct. BTW any reason why
you sent the patch three times?
Honza
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/ext3/balloc.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/balloc.c b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> index 22548f5..c557f22 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
> @@ -507,7 +507,6 @@ void ext3_free_blocks_sb(handle_t *handle, struct super_block *sb,
> sbi = EXT3_SB(sb);
> es = sbi->s_es;
> if (block < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) ||
> - block + count < block ||
> block + count > le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count)) {
> ext3_error (sb, "ext3_free_blocks",
> "Freeing blocks not in datazone - "
> -- 1.7.11.7
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists