lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130203145742.GA5424@thunk.org>
Date:	Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:57:42 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
	Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10 v3] ext4: add physical block and status member into
 extent status tree

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:19:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> I don't get this warning on my version of Sparse.
> 
> Sparse used to assume -m32 all the time but now that's been changed.
> Are you using the most recent version of Sparse?  Try passing -m64.

Hmm, I got my version of sparse from

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git

... where the latest version is 0.4.4, dated November 21, 2011.  Is
there a different dit repository I should be using?

I see that it doesn't complain with -m64, but the test program should
be valid for x86 with 32 bits just as much as 64 bits.  Am I missing
something?

						- Ted


View attachment "testcase" of type "text/plain" (882 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ