[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130203081943.GF4937@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:19:43 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10 v3] ext4: add physical block and status member into
extent status tree
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 01:21:13PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:03:43PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:43:33AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > Clang is first coming in my mind. I know that some one try to use it
> > > to build a linux kernel and get a lot of problems that are about gcc
> > > extension. But for us it seems that things are not too bad. ;)
> >
> > Clang accepts bitfields with "unsigned long long", but I've discovered
> > something which does _not_ support unsigned long long --- the "sparse"
> > tool. :-(
>
> Yes, this problem has been reported by Fengguang. So I am plan to use
> another method to define extent_status structure as last time we
> discuessed. What do you think?
>
I don't get this warning on my version of Sparse.
Sparse used to assume -m32 all the time but now that's been changed.
Are you using the most recent version of Sparse? Try passing -m64.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists