[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130313230928.GA11068@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:09:28 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: fanchaoting <fanchaoting@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, tyhicks@...onical.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
wangshilong1991@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ext2: do not mark_inode_dirty to avoid BUG_ON
On Tue 12-03-13 13:06:37, fanchaoting wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> commit 8e3dffc651cb668e1ff4d8b89cc1c3dde7540d3b leads into
> a regression that casue BUG_ON when unlinking inode.
>
> Reported-by: tyhicks@...onical.com
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@...fujitsu.com>
I ended up fixing the problem by the attached patch. It looks cleaner to
me that way... Thanks for your fix anyway.
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext2/balloc.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> index 9f9992b..06d82fc 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,6 @@ error_return:
> if (freed) {
> percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, freed);
> dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
> - mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> }
> }
>
> -- 1.7.7.6
>
>
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
View attachment "0001-ext2-Fix-BUG_ON-in-evict-on-inode-deletion.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1870 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists