lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:10:46 -0700
From:	Greg Harmon <gharm@...gle.com>
To:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Do not normalize request from fallocate

[Resending without html.]
I haven't looked at ext4 in awhile now. CC'ing Ted and Curt in case
they want to chime in. See comment below as well.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:50:45 +0100, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Block requests from fallocate has been normalized originally. Then it was
>> changed by 556b27abf73833923d5cd4be80006292e1b31662 not to normalize it.
>> And then it was changed by 3c6fe77017bc6ce489f231c35fed3220b6691836
>> again to normalize the request.
>>
>> The fact is that we _never_ want to normalize the request from
>> fallocate. We know exactly how much space we're going to use and we do
>> not want anyone to mess with the request and there is no point in doing
>> so.
> Looks reasonable.
> Reviewed-by:Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
>>
>> Commit 3c6fe77017bc6ce489f231c35fed3220b6691836 mentioned that

Is this a publicly available commit? I did not find it with a quick
google search.
Anyway, I don't see a problem with this commit off-hand, but I'll
defer to Ted or Curt.

-Greg Harmon

>> large fallocate requests were not physically contiguous. However it is
>> important to see why that is the case. Because the request is so big the
>> allocator will try to find free group to allocate from skipping block
>> groups which are used, which is fine. However it will only allocate
>> extents of 2^15-1 block (limitation of uninitialized extent size)
>> which will leave one block in each block group free which will make the
>> extent tree physically non-contiguous, however _only_ by one block which
>> is perfectly fine.
>>
>> This will never happen when we normalize the request because for some
>> reason (maybe bug) it will be normalized to much smaller request (2048
>> blocks) and those extents will then be merged together not leaving any
>> free block in between - hence physically contiguous. However the fact
>> that we're splitting huge requests into ton of smaller ones and then
>> merging extents together is very _very_ bad for fallocate performance.
>>
>> The situation is even worst since with commit
>> ec22ba8edb507395c95fbc617eea26a6b2d98797 we no longer merge
>> uninitialized extents so we end up with absolutely _huge_ extent tree
>> for bigger fallocate requests which is also bad for performance but not
>> only when fallocate itself, but even when working with the file
>> later on.
>>
>> Fix this by disabling normalization for fallocate. From my simple testing
>> with this commit fallocate is much faster on non fragmented file
>> system. On my system fallocate 15T is almost 3x faster with this patch
>> and removing this file is almost 2x faster - tested on real hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ext4/extents.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
>>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> index e2bb929..a40a602 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
>> @@ -4422,16 +4422,18 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
>>               trace_ext4_fallocate_exit(inode, offset, max_blocks, ret);
>>               return ret;
>>       }
>> -     flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT;
>> -     if (mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
>> -             flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE;
>> +
>>       /*
>> -      * Don't normalize the request if it can fit in one extent so
>> -      * that it doesn't get unnecessarily split into multiple
>> -      * extents.
>> +      * We do NOT want the requests from fallocate to be normalized
>> +      * ever!. We know exactly how much we want to allocate and
>> +      * we do not need to do any mumbo-jumbo with it. Requests bigger
>> +      * than uninit extent size, will be divided automatically into
>> +      * biggest possible extents.
>>        */
>> -     if (len <= EXT_UNINIT_MAX_LEN << blkbits)
>> -             flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE;
>> +     flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_UNINIT_EXT |
>> +             EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE;
>> +     if (mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)
>> +             flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_KEEP_SIZE;
>>
>>  retry:
>>       while (ret >= 0 && ret < max_blocks) {
>> --
>> 1.7.7.6
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ