lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <683906006.1314495.1365476711254.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 23:05:11 -0400 (EDT) From: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com> To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> Cc: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, Steve Best <sbest@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out Hello Ted, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> > To: "Eric Whitney" <enwlinux@...il.com> > Cc: "Dmitry Monakhov" <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>, "Christian Kujau" <lists@...dbynature.de>, "CAI Qian" > <caiqian@...hat.com>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-s390" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "Steve Best" > <sbest@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 10:41:14 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix a big-endian bug when an extent is zeroed out > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:34:06AM -0400, Eric Whitney wrote: > > > > The TI OMAP4 processor on my Pandaboard test system is little endian. > > Ah... so basically, we need to find a test platform which allows us to > boot arbitrary kernels and allows us to have root access (which means > it's unlikely we'll be able to do this via remote access) and which > doesn't have exotic power requirements (which as far as I know rules > out pSeries and zSeries systems....) > > It would also be nice if we could run tests in finite time, which > probably rules out the Hercules emulator (it runs at one-tenth zSeries > processor speeds, which doesn't win speed competitions by default, and > I suspect their storage speeds are even worse). > > Anyone else have any suggestions? Or anyone willing to help us run > ext4 regression tests on the ext4 dev tree, so we can find these > problems before we merge into mainline? I can help run xfstests for ext4 dev tree on x64, Power7, Z10 and KVM platforms with back-storage like SAN/multipath, iSCSI and FCoE. I plan to run this weekly and setup a wiki page to update the testing status by every Friday. CAI Qian > > Thanks, > > - Ted > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists