| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1365496448-9907-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:34:07 +0200 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Improve credit estimate for EXT4_SINGLEDATA_TRANS_BLOCKS Estimate of 27 credits for allocation of a block in extent based inode is unnecessarily high. We can easily argue 20 is enough. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> --- fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h index 4c216b1..042e463 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h @@ -29,11 +29,13 @@ * block to complete the transaction. * * For extents-enabled fs we may have to allocate and modify up to - * 5 levels of tree + root which are stored in the inode. */ + * 5 levels of tree, data block (for each of these we need bitmap + group + * summaries), root which is stored in the inode, sb + */ #define EXT4_SINGLEDATA_TRANS_BLOCKS(sb) \ (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS) \ - ? 27U : 8U) + ? 20U : 8U) /* Extended attribute operations touch at most two data buffers, * two bitmap buffers, and two group summaries, in addition to the inode -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists