[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130427071109.GA25329@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:11:09 +0800
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
To: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
wenqing.lz@...bao.com, Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@...sung.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unneeded call to ext4_es_remove_extent in
punch hole
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:20:22PM +0530, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
> >The commit
> > log is right before we use extent status tree to track all extent
> > information. In dev branch of ext4 tree, we track all extent status in
> > status tree. So we need to remove extent from status tree in punch
> > hole.
> I was of the opinion that filemap_write_and_wait_range will remove the
> extent from status tree if its still there.
> ok, I will check the dev branch.
Ah, please bear with me. In mainline kernel 3.9-rcX, we have used
status tree to track all extent status. You could also check 3.9-rcX
kernel. Please let me know if I miss something.
Thanks,
- Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists