[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:50:47 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: remove the entry from es tree when bigalloc is
enabled
On Mon 29-07-13 12:21:51, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:42:06AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > Now in ext4_da_page_release_reservation() we remove the entry from es
> > tree if to_release != 0. But there are two issues. One is that it is
> > wrong when blocksize != pagesize,
>
> The commit description says that this is wrong, but I don't see
> anything in the patch which addresses this. And could you state what
> the impact is of this wrongness?
Well, this wrongness actually shouldn't have any real impact - for
blocksize < pagesize the extent tree isn't used while truncate_pagecache()
is running and ext4_truncate() then removes the whole truncated range from
the tree again which hides any problems in
ext4_da_page_release_reservation(). When bigalloc is used, we use the
extent tree during truncate_pagecache() but to_release is always == 1 and
thus the problem doesn't exist.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists