[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131021115954.GA2708@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:59:54 +0800
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: check for overlapping extents in
ext4_valid_extent_entries()
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 09:27:27PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> A corrupted ext4 may have out of order leaf extents, i.e.
>
> extent: lblk 0--1023, len 1024, pblk 9217, flags: LEAF UNINIT
> extent: lblk 1000--2047, len 1024, pblk 10241, flags: LEAF UNINIT
> ^^^^ overlap with previous extent
>
> Reading such extent could hit BUG_ON() in ext4_es_cache_extent().
>
> BUG_ON(end < lblk);
>
> The problem is that __read_extent_tree_block() tries to cache holes as
> well but assumes 'lblk' is greater than 'prev' and passes underflowed
> length to ext4_es_cache_extent(). Fix it by checking for overlapping
> extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries().
>
> I hit this when fuzz testing ext4, and am able to reproduce it by
> modifying the on-disk extent by hand.
>
> Ran xfstests on patched ext4 and no regression.
>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
Self NAK, I found problems in tests, will think about it more.
Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists