linux-ext4 - Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:18:03 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Martin Boutin <martboutin@...il.com>,
	"Kernel.org-Linux-RAID" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
	"Kernel.org-Linux-EXT4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow

> xfs: align initial file allocations correctly.
> 
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> 
> The function xfs_bmap_isaeof() is used to indicate that an
> allocation is occurring at or past the end of file, and as such
> should be aligned to the underlying storage geometry if possible.
> 
> Commit 27a3f8f ("xfs: introduce xfs_bmap_last_extent") changed the
> behaviour of this function for empty files - it turned off
> allocation alignment for this case accidentally. Hence large initial
> allocations from direct IO are not getting correctly aligned to the
> underlying geometry, and that is cause write performance to drop in
> alignment sensitive configurations.
> 
> Fix it by considering allocation into empty files as requiring
> aligned allocation again.

Seems like this one didn't get picked up yet?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html