[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131211002753.GD10988@dastard>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:27:53 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Martin Boutin <martboutin@...il.com>,
"Kernel.org-Linux-RAID" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
"Kernel.org-Linux-EXT4" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Filesystem writes on RAID5 too slow
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:18:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > xfs: align initial file allocations correctly.
> >
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> >
> > The function xfs_bmap_isaeof() is used to indicate that an
> > allocation is occurring at or past the end of file, and as such
> > should be aligned to the underlying storage geometry if possible.
> >
> > Commit 27a3f8f ("xfs: introduce xfs_bmap_last_extent") changed the
> > behaviour of this function for empty files - it turned off
> > allocation alignment for this case accidentally. Hence large initial
> > allocations from direct IO are not getting correctly aligned to the
> > underlying geometry, and that is cause write performance to drop in
> > alignment sensitive configurations.
> >
> > Fix it by considering allocation into empty files as requiring
> > aligned allocation again.
>
> Seems like this one didn't get picked up yet?
I'm about to resend all my outstanding patches...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists