linux-ext4 - Re: xfstests failures in v3.13-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140107120109.GA16640@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:01:09 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx>
Subject: Re: xfstests failures in v3.13-rc7

On Tue 07-01-14 02:57:13, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have been running xfstests with ext4 on a ramdisk (brd), and noticed a
> few tests were failing with an inconsistent file system at the end of
> the test.
> 
> The following fail for v3.13-rc7:
> generic/013
> generic/083
> generic/269
> generic/321 (this one is not inconsistent fs, see log)
> generic/322
> 
> The output of xfstests for these failures is also attached.
> 
> It looks like generic/013 should be resolved by:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/42032
> Are any of the others known failures, especially for brd?
  Are you using any special mkfs options? Because the referenced patch
should fix only a problem if you are using bigalloc feature...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html