| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:56:19 +0000 From: jon ernst <jonernst07@...il.com> To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com> Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, "matthew@....cx" <matthew@....cx> Subject: Re: xfstests failures in v3.13-rc7 Vishal, I am ext4 newbie. Though I could share my experience about test 013 failure. Make sure you have latest (or 1.42.9) e2fsck installed on your system. Notice that v1.42.8 will cause 013 fail due to this: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/39980 To confirm my guess, you can check your xfstest full log to see if e2fsck fail or not. Just my idea. Could be wrong. Please correct me. Best, Jon On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.verma@...el.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have been running xfstests with ext4 on a ramdisk (brd), and noticed a > few tests were failing with an inconsistent file system at the end of > the test. > > The following fail for v3.13-rc7: > generic/013 > generic/083 > generic/269 > generic/321 (this one is not inconsistent fs, see log) > generic/322 > > The output of xfstests for these failures is also attached. > > It looks like generic/013 should be resolved by: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/42032 > Are any of the others known failures, especially for brd? > > Thanks, > -Vishal > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists