[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140312034841.GC31864@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:48:41 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
liezhi.yang@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] create_inode: fix gcc -Wall complaints
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:45:39PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:41:10PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > We had several functions that were not returning zero on success. Fix
> > this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
>
> One additional gcc -Wall nit which I have not yet fixed:
>
> create_inode.c is using ext2fs_inline_data_init() which is currently a
> private function defined in ext2fsP.h.
>
> We either need to make this a publically exported interface (in which
> case we have to guarantee that it is stable), or we need to find
> another way to make the right thing happen here.
>
> Darrick, Robert, do you have any thoughts or suggestions?
I fixed that up in the cppcheck cleanups patch by moving those declarations to
ext2fs.h. Maybe I should have shoved the patch closer to the head.
--D
>
> - Ted
>
> P.S. My bad for not doing a gcc -Wall run on the patches before
> accepting them. And in the future, I'd appreciate it if people who
> are preparing patches do a "make gcc-wall" and make sure you're not
> making things worse. There are plenty of bugs that can be turned up
> this way.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists