[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904154925.GF4047@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:49:25 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: track extent status tree shrinker delay
statictics
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:10:48PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > When reading through this again, I realized that we probably don't want
> > this file in /proc/fs/ext4 but rather in /sys/kernel/debug/ext4 because
> > it's really a debugging interface and we don't want any tools to start
> > using it.
>
> Fair enough. I will fix it in next version.
I was actually OK with leaving it in /proc, since we have a number of
other debugging files in /proc/fs/ext4/<dev> already, and I'm not sure
spreading ext4's foot print so that we have some files in /proc, some
in /sys, and some in debugfs is worth decreasing the possibility that
some tool would start depending on the contents of that file --- I
can't really imagine why non-fs developers would ever care about such
statistics.
I probably *would* be in favor of creating a new config option which
disables /proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/mballoc_groups and
/proc/fs/ext4/<dev>/es_shrinker_info, to help with the people who care
shrinking the total footprint of the Linux kernel for embedded
application (kernel tinification), though.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists