[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140904155436.GG4047@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:54:36 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] ext4: cache extent hole in extent status tree for
ext4_da_map_blocks()
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > I thought the reason why we have the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_PUT_HOLE flag
> > is because in ext4_da_map_blocks(), if there is a hole, we will be
> > immediately following it up with a call to ext4_es_insert_extent() to
> > fill in the hole with the EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED flag. The only time
> > we don't is if we run into an ENOSPC error.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Yes, you are right. The purpose is used to do the work like you said
> above. As the commit log described this flag brings a huge number of
> cache misses when an empty file is written.
Right, and I was trying to figure out why that was happening, because
it looked like in the normal case we would immediately fill in the
hole afterwards. I was goign to try doing some tracing to understand
why this was resulting a huge number of cache misses, but I haven't
had time to do that investigation yet. Can you sketch out the
scenario where this was leading to so many cache misses?
Thanks,
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists