| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1413988148-11433-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:29:08 +0200 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Ted Tso <tytso@....edu> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Fix overflow when updating superblock backups after resize When there are no meta block groups update_backups() will compute the backup block in 32-bit arithmetics thus possibly overflowing the block number and corrupting the filesystem. OTOH filesystems without meta block groups larger than 16 TB should be rare. Fix the problem by doing the counting in 64-bit arithmetics. Coverity-id: 741252 CC: stable@...r.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c index f298c60f907d..ca4588388fc3 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static void update_backups(struct super_block *sb, int blk_off, char *data, break; if (meta_bg == 0) - backup_block = group * bpg + blk_off; + backup_block = ((ext4_fsblk_t)group) * bpg + blk_off; else backup_block = (ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group)); -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists