[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150411134811.GI6540@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:48:11 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: walter harms <wharms@....de>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...gle.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext4 crypto: testing the wrong variable
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:51PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > why test *buf == NULL ? xfree() can handle this.
> >
> > the question is do programm depend on *buf=NULL.
> > In case of IS_ERR(*buf) *buf will be left unchanged
> > and later prgramms may things there is a buffer
> > available ?
>
> Good point. That IS_ERR() check is going to cause all kinds of future
> bugs.
Yes, it's not needed at all, so I'll just remove it. I'm also going
to be fixing the whole fname_crypto_alloc_buffer() and
fname_crypto_free_buffer() so the calling convention isn't as
horrendous. So basically, instead of
int ext4_fname_crypto_alloc_buffer(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
unsigned char **obuf, u32 *olen, u32 ilen);
void ext4_fname_crypto_free_buffer(void **buf);
it will be:
int ext4_fname_crypto_alloc_buffer(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
struct ext4_str *crypto_str, u32 ilen);
void ext4_fname_crypto_free_buffer(struct ext4_str *crypto_str);
(And BTW, this isn't appropriate for kernel-janitors since this code
isn't upstream yet)
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists