linux-ext4 - Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:54:37 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Theodore,
> 
> as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
> block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
> storage devices.
> 
> You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
> b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
> revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
> v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.
> 
> Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
> late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
> stable would suffice anyway.
> 
> In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
> and v4.2.

Already done.  See the latest version of the dev branch.  I noticed
this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it.

     	     	    	      	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html