linux-ext4 - Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:19:19 -0500
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:54:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi Theodore,
> > 
> > as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
> > block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
> > storage devices.
> > 
> > You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
> > b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
> > revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
> > v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.
> > 
> > Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
> > late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
> > stable would suffice anyway.
> > 
> > In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
> > and v4.2.
> 
> Already done.  See the latest version of the dev branch.  I noticed
> this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it.

cool, thanks

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)