lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55E5FF01.2000304@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:39:45 -0400
From: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
To: Albino B Neto <bino@...eup.net>,
Raymond Jennings <shentino@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes
On 2015-09-01 06:29, Albino B Neto wrote:
> 2015-08-31 19:31 GMT-03:00 Raymond Jennings <shentino@...il.com>:
>> I think also that we should remove the ext2 driver before we remove the ext3
>> driver.
>
> Yes. It is logical to remove the old ext2 drive, because there are
> more computers with ext3 that ext2. Ext2 is obsolete by existing
> technologies.
>
NO, it is not logical. A vast majority of Android smartphones in the
wild use ext2, as do a very significant portion of embedded systems that
don't have room for the few hundred kilobytes of extra code that the
ext4 driver has in comparison to ext2.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (3019 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists