[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151015144146.GL10391@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:41:46 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@...app.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] generic/80[0-2]: support xfs in addition to btrfs
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:19:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +# this test requires the test fs support reflink...
> > +#
> > +_require_test_reflink()
> > +{
> > + case $FSTYP in
> > + xfs)
> > + xfs_info "${TEST_DIR}" | grep reflink=1 -c -q || _notrun "Reflink not supported by this filesystem type: $FSTYP"
> > + ;;
> > + btrfs)
> > + true
> > + ;;
> > + *)
> > + _notrun "Reflink not supported by this filesystem type: $FSTYP"
> > + ;;
> > + esac
>
> I don't think that's a good test - we need to check if it's supported by
> trying it. That'll automatically get us coverage for other file systems
> like xfs.
>
> Note that dedup should get it's own feature check, as currently hacking
> nfs into this check will also run dedup tests that can't really be
> supported.
Good point. I'll throw that in while I rework the tests.
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists