[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151109075926.GB17974@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:59:26 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@...app.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 00/12] xfstests: test the btrfs/xfs reflink/dedupe ioctls
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:12:57PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> * I don't have any interesting NFS/CIFS setups for test. :(
I have a banrch with client and server support for NFSv4.2 CLONE
support:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/pnfs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/reflink+clone
For now you want to use btrfs on the server, as using reflinks on XFS
seems to be a little unstable over NFS.
> If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just
> pull from my github trees for kernel[1], xfsprogs[2], and xfstests[3].
> They should just work with the btrfs that's in 4.3.
>
> Comments and questions are, as always, welcome.
Any reason the groups are called clone? I don't really have an opinion
on clone vs reflink but given that the xfs_io command is reflink I'd
rather be consistent.
Otherwise I'd say get it merged ASAP, we can still fix up various
details later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists