[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151210191429.GN10580@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:14:29 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: david@...morbit.com, fstests@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
tao.peng@...marydata.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Anna.Schumaker@...app.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either
> the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone
> behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring. I didn't have
> time to look into why it's failing yet.
Huh. Works reliably for /me; could you send me the output from 849?
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists