[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151211000757.GA7499@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:07:57 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, david@...morbit.com,
fstests@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, tao.peng@...marydata.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@...app.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:14:29AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either
> > the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone
> > behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring. I didn't have
> > time to look into why it's failing yet.
>
> Huh. Works reliably for /me; could you send me the output from 849?
--- tests/generic/849.out 2015-12-09 15:31:50.492879152 +0000
+++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/849.out.bad 2015-12-11
00:02:25.154347175 +0000
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
QA output created by 849
Create the original files
f4820540fc0ac02750739896fe028d56 TEST_DIR/test-849/file1
-dc881c004745c49f7f4e9cc766f57bc8 TEST_DIR/test-849/file2
+eb34153e9ed1e774db28cbbe4090a449 TEST_DIR/test-849/file2
dc881c004745c49f7f4e9cc766f57bc8 TEST_DIR/test-849/file2.chk
Compare against check files
+file2 and file2.chk do not match
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists