linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 06/12] xfs/030: fix output on newer filesystems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:40:40 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] xfs/030: fix output on newer filesystems

On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:20:50PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Still fails for me:
> 
> --- tests/xfs/030.out	2016-03-03 07:55:58.556427678 +0000
> +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/030.out.bad	2016-03-05 20:20:17.561433837 +0000
> @@ -231,8 +231,6 @@
>  bad agbno AGBNO in agfl, agno 0
>  bad agbno AGBNO in agfl, agno 0
>  bad agbno AGBNO in agfl, agno 0
> -bad agbno AGBNO in agfl, agno 0
> -bad agbno AGBNO in agfl, agno 0

That's because the free lists are of different lengths on the
different fs configs. Not sure how best to handle it - maybe just
filter then entire bad agbno in agfl line out?

I'm going to commit the change anyway, as this is a separate issue
that needs to be solved.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html