[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hcSz7zKXzW3ZtdFbgBLbe0J2oNR-QC2L83adsvU3siFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:37:14 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Verma, Vishal L
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> <>
>
>> Seems kind of sad to fail the fault due to a bad block when we were
>> going to zero it anyway, right? I'm not seeing a compelling reason to
>> keep any zeroing in fs/dax.c.
>
> Agreed - but how do we do this? clear_pmem needs to be able to clear an
> arbitrary number of bytes, but to go through the driver, we'd need to
> send down a bio? If only the driver had an rw_bytes like interface that
> could be used by anyone... :)
I think we're ok because clear_pmem() will always happen on PAGE_SIZE,
or HPAGE_SIZE boundaries.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists