[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160329195844.GW17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:58:45 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
dhowells@...hat.com,
Linux Filesystem Development List
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Miklos's vfs/nfs/ext4 patches in the ext4.git tree
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 05:09:55PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I have the following patches in the ext4.git tree which I plan to push
> to Linus as bug fixes during this development cycles. Al, are you
> happy with Miklos's v2 version of "fs: add file_dentrY()" patch?
I'm not really happy, but I guess we'll have to live with that approach.
I would still like to point out that *any* use of file_dentry() (or
file->f_path.dentry, for that matter) is a serious red flag - odds are,
the code using it is broken, possibly by design.
I still don't understand the locking in ext4 crypto, and I'm not at all
convinced that it is correct ;-/ OTOH, there are filesystems where we
really need dentry and (hopefully) treat it sanely enough, so consider
that helper and method ACKed. I can take it via vfs.git, or leave it
to ext4.git, or do some combination thereof (e.g. the infrastructure
goes into never-rebased branch in vfs.git, with ext4/btrfs/nfs merging
from it). Up to you...
Al, still bloody unhappy about the whole pile of worms...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists