[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908085615.GA21050@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:56:15 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Török Edwin <edwin@...rok.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [STABLE CHERRYPICK] ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields
directly during checksum verification
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:21:34AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this was sent to the right place: stable@...nel.org
> doesn't seem to exist, I can't find this message in the ML archives,
> or the 4.7.3 changelog. Could you please include this in 4.7.4, I've
> been waiting for this patch to get included ever since 4.7.1...
Yeah, I never saw it.
Will add it to the queue, it's long, might take a release or two to make
it...
Were there any objections from the ext4 maintainers in taking the patch
below?
thanks,
greg k-h
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [STABLE CHERRYPICK] ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields directly during checksum verification
> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:29:55 -0400
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> To: stable@...nel.org
> CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Török Edwin <edwin@...rok.net>
>
> Hi, please cherry pick the following commit into the stable kernels.
> The commit landed in 4.8-rc1. It wasn't marked with a cc:
> stable@...nel.org, but it should be backported since it affecting a
> number of users who are trying to use ext4's metadata checksum
> feature.
>
> Thanks!!
>
> commit b47820edd1634dc1208f9212b7ecfb4230610a23
> Author: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
> Date: Sun Jul 3 17:51:39 2016 -0400
>
> ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields directly during checksum verification
>
> We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of
> metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this
> without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are
> being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged.
> In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata
> checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the
> checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
>
> - Ted
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists