[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908152749.GA9304@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:27:49 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Török Edwin <edwin@...rok.net>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: [STABLE CHERRYPICK] ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields
directly during checksum verification
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:21:34AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure if this was sent to the right place: stable@...nel.org
> > doesn't seem to exist, I can't find this message in the ML archives,
> > or the 4.7.3 changelog. Could you please include this in 4.7.4, I've
> > been waiting for this patch to get included ever since 4.7.1...
>
> Yeah, I never saw it.
>
> Will add it to the queue, it's long, might take a release or two to make
> it...
>
> Were there any objections from the ext4 maintainers in taking the patch
> below?
None here. I'll see if I can poke Ted too.
--D
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: [STABLE CHERRYPICK] ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields directly during checksum verification
> > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:29:55 -0400
> > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > To: stable@...nel.org
> > CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Török Edwin <edwin@...rok.net>
> >
> > Hi, please cherry pick the following commit into the stable kernels.
> > The commit landed in 4.8-rc1. It wasn't marked with a cc:
> > stable@...nel.org, but it should be backported since it affecting a
> > number of users who are trying to use ext4's metadata checksum
> > feature.
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > commit b47820edd1634dc1208f9212b7ecfb4230610a23
> > Author: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
> > Date: Sun Jul 3 17:51:39 2016 -0400
> >
> > ext4: avoid modifying checksum fields directly during checksum verification
> >
> > We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of
> > metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this
> > without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are
> > being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged.
> > In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata
> > checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the
> > checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
> >
> > - Ted
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists